Planning appeal decision
180, Bakers Lane, Knowle, B93 8PS
Planning appeal 6002539 at 180, Bakers Lane, Knowle, B93 8PS (Warwick District Council) was dismissed on 26 February 2026 by Inspector Barton P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the construction of a single dwelling family detached house with associated amenities
- Authority
- Warwick District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Barton P
- Postcode
- B93 8PS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the appeal site would be in a suitable location for the proposed development, in terms of access to services and facilities
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposed development complies with the policies of the Net Zero Carbon Development Plan Document
- the effect of the proposed development on ecological interests
- whether other considerations clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and any other harm as to amount to very special circumstances
What decided it
The appeal site is not in a sustainable location because occupants would be heavily reliant on private motor vehicles to access services and facilities, failing the requirement of paragraph 155(c) of the Framework and meaning the development cannot be justified as an exception to inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
The modest benefits of delivering one dwelling and biodiversity improvements, afforded moderate weight, do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness, the unsustainable location, harm to character and appearance, and failure to comply with net zero carbon policies, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS18Policy H1Policy NE4Policy NE2Policy NE3Policies NZC1Policies NZC2(A)Policies NZC2(B)Policies NZC2(C)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warwick
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 September 20266011601Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
- Dismissed23 September 20266006637Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
- Allowed27 July 20266004371South Side, Wharf Lane, Lapworth, B94 6NR
- Allowed21 July 20266007706Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB
- Allowed13 July 20266003642The Three Horseshoes, Spring Hill, Bubbenhall, CV8 3BD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®