Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 September 20266012775

Flat 3, 49 Madeira Park, Royal Tunbridge Wells, TN2 5SY

Planning appeal 6012775 at Flat 3, 49 Madeira Park, Royal Tunbridge Wells, TN2 5SY (Tunbridge Wells) was allowed on 3 September 2026 by Inspector L McKay, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building and the Madeira Park and Warwick Park Conservation Area.

Replacement of 2 windows at first floor level from single-glazed white timber frames to double-glazed uPVC (front oriel window and rear casement window with leaded lights and fanlights)

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written Part 1
Development
other
Inspector
L McKay
Postcode
TN2 5SY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building and the Madeira Park and Warwick Park Conservation Area

What decided it

The front window's noticeably different profile and appearance, clearly visible from the road, detracts from the visual coherence of the front elevation and harms the conservation area, and this harm is not outweighed by the limited weight given to energy efficiency benefits where sympathetic alternatives were available.

The slight harm to the conservation area from the front window, being harm to a designated heritage asset afforded considerable importance and weight, was not outweighed by the limited weight given to energy efficiency benefits where equivalent improvements could have been achieved through more sympathetic windows

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy STR8Policy H11Policy EN1Policy EN4
National Planning Policy Framework
Policy HE6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

69 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tunbridge Wells

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266012604
    Manchester House The Heath, Horsmonden, TN12 8HT
  2. Dismissed21 September 20266005229
    1 The Down Cottages, Lamberhurst Down, Lamberhurst, TN3 8EX
  3. Dismissed21 September 20266005225
    1 The Down Cottages, Lamberhurst Down, Lamberhurst, TN3 8EX
  4. Dismissed28 August 20266006260
    2 Ashfield Cottages, Horns Hill, Hawkhurst, Cranbrook, TN18 4XD
  5. Dismissed28 August 20266006259
    2 Ashfield Cottages, Horns Hill, Hawkhurst, Cranbrook, TN18 4XD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.