Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 March 20253352826

Park Lane Pharmacy, 27-29 High Street, CARSHALTON, SM5 3AX

Authority
London Borough of Sutton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Sargent J

What decided it

The Council's unreasonable and inconsistent handling of the heritage impact assessment (neutral/negative effect and substantial/less-than-substantial harm), the unjustified new concern over non-designated heritage assets, and the erroneous requirement for a legal agreement each caused the applicant unnecessary expense, justifying a partial costs award.

Framework references: 214, 215

Plan policies cited: Sutton Local Plan Policy 9, Policy H10 (London Plan 2021)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.