Planning appeal decision
Park Lane Pharmacy, 27-29 High Street, CARSHALTON, SM5 3AX
- Authority
- London Borough of Sutton
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sargent J
What decided it
The Council's unreasonable and inconsistent handling of the heritage impact assessment (neutral/negative effect and substantial/less-than-substantial harm), the unjustified new concern over non-designated heritage assets, and the erroneous requirement for a legal agreement each caused the applicant unnecessary expense, justifying a partial costs award.
Framework references: 214, 215
Plan policies cited: Sutton Local Plan Policy 9, Policy H10 (London Plan 2021)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®